Kualitas Morfologi Sel Asites Setelah Dilakukan Fiksasi Alkohol 96% dan NBF 10% pada Sediaan Sitologi Pewarnaan Hematoksilin-Eosin (HE)"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55123/insologi.v4i6.6397Keywords:
Fixation, 96% Alcohol, 10% NBF, Ascitic Fluid, Cytology, Hematoxylin-EosinAbstract
Ascitic fluid is an important specimen in diagnostic cytology for detecting malignancy and inflammation within the peritoneal cavity. The accuracy of cytological interpretation depends on cellular morphology, which is influenced by the type and effectiveness of fixation. Fixatives help preserve cellular integrity prior to Hematoxylin–Eosin (HE) staining. Alcohol 96% acts as a coagulative fixative that rapidly denatures proteins, whereas 10% Neutral Buffered Formalin (NBF) is a non-coagulative fixative that forms protein cross-links, providing greater structural stability but requiring longer fixation time. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the morphological quality of ascitic fluid cells fixed with 96% alcohol and 10% NBF on HE-stained cytological preparations to determine the most optimal fixative. A quantitative comparative design with a laboratory-based observational approach was used. Six ascitic fluid specimens were fixed with 96% alcohol for 15 minutes and 10% NBF for 24 hours. Thin smear preparations were stained with HE and assessed for nuclear clarity, cytoplasmic integrity, and staining artifacts using an ordinal score of 1–4. Data were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test at a 95% confidence level (α = 0.05). Results showed that 96% alcohol produced clearer nuclear details, sharper cytoplasmic borders, and fewer artifacts than 10% NBF. Although NBF provided stable cellular structures, nuclei appeared darker and cytoplasmic homogeneity decreased due to prolonged fixation. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference (p < 0.05). Thus, 96% alcohol offers superior ascitic cell morphology and serves as an efficient alternative fixative for body fluid cytology.
Downloads
References
Bancroft, J. D., & Gamble, M. (2019). Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques (8th ed.). Elsevier.
Charisma, L., Hidayat, R., & Susanto, D. (2023). Comparative analysis of alcohol-based and formalin fixation on cytological morphology of effusion samples. Journal of Cytopathology and Diagnostic Research, 17(2), 145–152.
Inderiati, E., & Pratiwi, S. (2021). Pengaruh jenis fiksatif terhadap kualitas morfologi sel pada sediaan sitologi cairan tubuh. Jurnal Teknologi Laboratorium Medis Indonesia, 6(2), 45–52.
Ireka, A., Rahman, M. H., & Hasan, N. (2019). Evaluation of fixative agents for cytological specimen preservation and staining characteristics. International Journal of Cytopathology and Laboratory Medicine, 5(1), 12–18.
Nathan, P. A., Kumar, S., & Lee, J. H. (2022). Evaluation of fixatives in preserving cellular details in body fluid cytology: A comparative study. Diagnostic Cytopathology, 50(5), 234–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.24910
Nathan, A. R., Thiru, M., & Josephine, C. (2022). Comparative assessment of formalin and alcohol-based fixatives in cell block preparation of ascitic fluid. Journal of Cytology and Histopathology Research, 11(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.4103/jchr.2022.11.1.22
Rahman, F., Abdullah, M., & Nur, L. (2021). The effect of different fixation methods on the morphology and staining quality of cytological specimens. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Sciences, 8(3), 22–28.
Koomen, J. M., Wang, Y., & Patel, K. (2022). Impact of fixation duration and buffer composition on formalin-induced artifacts in cytology preparations. Diagnostic Cytopathology, 50(8), 421–429. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.24976
Kumar, A., Singh, R., & Patel, M. (2020). Comparative performance of formalin and ethanol fixatives in histopathological and cytological preparations. International Journal of Laboratory Medicine Research, 12(4), 67–74.
Zhang, X., & Wang, Y. (2022). Influence of fixative type on nuclear morphology and chromatin preservation in cytopathology. Journal of Histotechnology, 45(3), 155–163. h
Ranjan, S., & Thomas, A. (2020). Alternative fixatives for cytological samples: An eco-friendly approach. Indian Journal of Cytology and Pathology, 41(2), 90–96.
World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). Guidelines for Laboratory Quality and Biosafety in Cytopathology. WHO Press.
Zhou, Y., Chen, X., & Li, L. (2020). Mechanisms of cross-linking fixation and its influence on nucleic acid integrity in histopathological samples. Journal of Histotechnology, 43(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01478885.2020.1723546
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yohanes Ardian, Eviomitta Rizki, Adinugraha Amarullah, Marinta Marinta

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
Penulis mengakui bahwa INSOLOGI (Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi) sebagai publisher yang mempublikasikan pertama kali dengan lisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain, seperti: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dan lain-lain. Dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertama kali pada INSOLOGI (Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi).
























