Analisis Penggunaan ChatGPT sebagai Sumber Informasi terhadap Literasi Kebugaran

Authors

  • Indah Permata Sari LSPR Communication & Business Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55123/insologi.v5i1.7585

Keywords:

ChatGPT, Artificial Intelligence, Fitness Literacy, Digital Health Literacy, Physical Activity

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence, particularly ChatGPT, has created new opportunities for delivering health and fitness information. However, empirical evidence regarding its use as a fitness information source and its relationship with fitness literacy remains limited. This study aimed to analyze the associations between the frequency of ChatGPT use, information-seeking purposes, perceived usefulness of ChatGPT, and fitness literacy. The study employed a cross-sectional design with a sample of 55 respondents, consisting of members who engaged in fitness activities using a personal trainer at a location in South Tangerang. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including correlation tests. The results demonstrated significant positive relationships between the frequency of ChatGPT use and fitness literacy (p < 0.001), information-seeking purposes and fitness literacy (p < 0.001), and perceived usefulness of ChatGPT and fitness literacy (p < 0.001), with perceived usefulness showing the strongest association. These findings indicate that more frequent use of ChatGPT, more practical information-seeking purposes, and higher perceived usefulness are associated with higher levels of fitness literacy. In conclusion, ChatGPT has the potential to serve as an effective supportive information source for enhancing fitness literacy among physically active adults.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abeo, A. N. A., Armstrong, S., Scriney, M., & Goss, H. (2025). Artificial intelligence techniques and health literacy: A systematic review. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health, 3(4), 100269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcpdig.2025.100269

Alam, Z., Abdullahi, A. S., Alnuaimi, S. N. S., Al Shaka, H. A., Alderei, S. S. S., Alhemeiri, A. A. A., Khorzom, H., Almaskari, H. J. M., Almaamari, K. A., Al Seiari, K., Al Saadi, M., Al Shamsi, N., Al Zaabi, O., Altamimi, S., & Rahma, A. T. (2025). eHealth literacy and attitudes towards use of artificial intelligence among university students in the United Arab Emirates: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Digital Health, 7, 1574263. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1574263

Ayre, J., Mac O., McCaffery, K., McKay, B. R., Liu, M., Shi, Y., Rezwan, A., & Dunn, A. G. (2024). New frontiers in health literacy: Using ChatGPT to simplify health information for people in the community. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 39(4), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08469-w

Bauman, A., Merom, D., Bull, F. C., Buchner, D. M., & Fiatarone Singh, M. A. (2016). Updating the evidence for physical activity: Summative reviews of the epidemiological evidence, prevalence, and interventions to promote “active aging.” The Gerontologist, 56(Suppl 2), S268–S280. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw031

Blease, C., Kaptchuk, T. J., Bernstein, M. H., Mandl, K. D., Halamka, J. D., & DesRoches, C. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the future of primary care: Exploratory qualitative study of UK general practitioners’ views. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(3), e12802. https://doi.org/10.2196/12802

Demirtaş Özyılmaz, Z. (2025). Evaluating the readability of ChatGPT-generated responses on travel health risks. International Maritime Health. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.5603/imh.104400

Friis, K., Lasgaard, M., Rowlands, G., Osborne, R. H., & Maindal, H. T. (2016). Health literacy mediates the relationship between educational attainment and health behavior: A Danish population-based study. Journal of Health Communication, 21(Suppl 2), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1201175

Guthold, R., Stevens, G. A., Riley, L. M., & Bull, F. C. (2020). Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: A pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1.6 million participants. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2

Kickbusch, I., Piselli, D., Agrawal, A., Balicer, R., Banner, O., Adelhardt, M., Capobianco, E., Fabian, C., Gill, A. S., Lupton, D., Medhora, R. P., Ndili, N., Ryś, A., Sambuli, N., Settle, D., Swaminathan, S., Morales, J. V., Wolpert, M., Wyckoff, A. W., & Xue, L. (2021). The Lancet and Financial Times Commission on governing health futures 2030: Growing up in a digital world. The Lancet, 398(10312), 1727–1776. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01824-9

Li, H., Yang, Z., & Li, J. (2025). The impact of digital literacy on individual health: A perspective based on fitness exercise. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1625235. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1625235

Lim, M. L., van Schooten, K. S., Radford, K. A., & Delbaere, K. (2021). Association between health literacy and physical activity in older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Promotion International, 36(5), 1482–1497. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa072

Nadarzynski, T., Miles, O., Cowie, A., & Ridge, D. (2019). Acceptability of artificial intelligence (AI)-led chatbot services in healthcare: A mixed-methods study. Digital Health, 5, 2055207619871808. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619871808

Okan, O., Messer, M., Levin-Zamir, D., Paakkari, L., & Sørensen, K. (2023). Health literacy as a social vaccine in the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Promotion International, 38(4), daab197. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daab197

Ozen, H. (2021). Gender difference in eHealth literacy: Empirical evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i4/9769

Sørensen, K., Pelikan, J. M., Röthlin, F., Ganahl, K., Slonska, Z., Doyle, G., Fullam, J., Kondilis, B., Agrafiotis, D., Uiters, E., Falcon, M., Mensing, M., Tchamov, K., van den Broucke, S., & Brand, H. (2015). Health literacy in Europe: Comparative results of the European health literacy survey (HLS-EU). European Journal of Public Health, 25(6), 1053–1058. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv043

Swisher, A. R., Wu, A. W., Liu, G. C., Lee, M. K., Carle, T. R., & Tang, D. M. (2024). Enhancing health literacy: Evaluating the readability of patient handouts revised by ChatGPT’s large language model. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 171(6), 1751–1757. https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.927

Tbaishat, D. M., & Elfadel, M. W. (2025). Artificial intelligence for social innovation in health education: Promoting health literacy through personalized AI-driven learning tools—A systematic review. BMC Medical Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08462-3

Van der Vaart, R., & Drossaert, C. (2017). Development of the digital health literacy instrument: Measuring a broad spectrum of health 1.0 and health 2.0 skills. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(1), e27. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6709

Zhao, B. Y., Huang, L., Cheng, X., et al. (2024). Digital health literacy and associated factors among internet users from China: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 24, 908. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18324-0

Downloads

Published

2026-02-10

How to Cite

Indah Permata Sari. (2026). Analisis Penggunaan ChatGPT sebagai Sumber Informasi terhadap Literasi Kebugaran. INSOLOGI: Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 5(1), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.55123/insologi.v5i1.7585