Bureaucratic Accountability In The Management of The Operational Fund School (BOS) (Case Study On Elementary Education Kupang)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55123/mamen.v1i4.1039Keywords:
Accountability, Bureaucracy, DemocracyAbstract
The Government in a democracy should be accountable to the public because the public authority as the holder of the key. The Government should be more transparent and responsible in managing resources public funds or a public authority. Bureaucratic accountability carried out in a balanced internal and external way so that it can produce the performance of education bureaucrats in accordance with the rules and give a sense of smug for stakeholders in the education system. The research aims to find out the school internally and externally bureaucracy Accountability, the control between bureaucratic accountability in the school and methods can ensure the accountability of the school bureaucracy. This type of research uses the instrumental case studies to examine a case in order to be presented a perspective on the issue or theory. The data collected with qualitative methods, documents, archive footage, interviews, direct observation, as well as the role of observation, and physical devices. The informant set by purposive. Data validation using triangulation technique. Research results generate internal accountability carried out by the school. Management of the Fund BOS does not match the technical rules but the school's responsibility to accept the consequences of their performance. While the external accountability is not implemented by the school. The school did not involve the stakeholders of the school Committee, teachers and parents in the process of management of the Fund BOS, does not make use of the media the school as school accountability to the public as well as the use of funds of the BOS is not in accordance with the needs of the stakeholders. An imbalance of internal and external accountability requires a control method to ensure the accountability of public control that is supporting the implementation of the control hierarchy, professional, legal, and political.
Downloads
References
Adang Djaha, Ajis Salim, 2012. Kontrol dan Akuntabilitas Birokrasi dalam Pelayanan Pendidikan Dasar di Kabupaten Alor (Disertasi), Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar.
Albrow, Martin,1989. Birokrasi, Tiara Wacana, Yogyakarta.
Bevir, Mark. 2007. Public Governance Vol. I , Sage Library Of Political Science. Indiana University
Blau, Peter M & Marshal W. Meyer, 2000. Birokrasi Dalam Masyarakat Modern. Prestasi Pustaka Karya; Jakarta
Betham, David. 1990. Birokrasi. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta
Creswell, John W. 2012. Research Design; Pendekatan Kualitatatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Pustaka Pelajar,Yogyakarta
Denzin, Norman K dan Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2009. Handbook Of Qualitative Research. Sage Publication
Derhardt, Janet, V. dan Roberdt, B. Denhart, 2003. The New Public Service – Serving, Not Steering, M.F. Sharpe, New York, London, England.
, 2006. Public Administration:An Action Overview, Fisth Edition, Thomson Wadsworth, United States of America.
Dubnick, M. (2005). Accountability and The Promise Of Performance: In Search Of The Mechanisms. Public Performance and Management Review, 28 (3)
Dwiyanto, Agus, dkk, 2003. Governance Decentralized Survey 2002 dalam Reformasi Tata Pemerintahan dan Otonomi Daerah, Pusat Studi Kependudukan dan Kebijakan Universitas Gajah Mada, Yogyakarta
, 2010. Manajemen Pelayanan public : peduli, inklusif dan kolaboratif, Gajah Mada University Press, 2010
Peters, B Guy and Piere John, 2007. The Handbook of Public Administration : Concise Paperback Edition, First. Edition, Los Angelels: Sage Publication.
Caiden, Gerald E. 1988. Toward a General Theory of Official Corruption. Asian Journal Of Public Administration
Finer, Herman, 1941. “Administrative Responsibility in Democratic Government”, Public Administration Review, Vol 1
Friedrich, C.J. (1940). Public policy and the nature of administrative responsibility. In C.J. Friedrich & E.S. Mason (Eds.), Public policy (pp. 3-24). Cambridge: Harvard Univer sity Press.
Koppell, Jonathan, 2005, ‘Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of “Multiple Accountabilities Disorder”’, Public Administration Review, 65, 1: 94-107.
O’Connell, Lenahan, 2005, ‘Program Accountability as an Emergent Property: The Role of Stakeholders in a Program’s Field’, Public Administration Review, 65, 1: 85-93.
Romzek, Barbara, S. dan Melvin, J. Dubnick, 1987. Accountability in the Public Sector Lesson from the Challenger Tragedy. Public Administration Review 47 (3)
Romzek, Barbara, S. dan Melvin, J. Dubnick 2000. Dynamics of Public Sector Accountability in Era of Reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Marini Sari Dewi Seger
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Hak cipta pada setiap artikel adalah milik penulis.
Penulis mengakui bahwa MAMEN (Jurnal Manajemen) sebagai publisher yang mempublikasikan pertama kali dengan lisensi
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Penulis dapat memasukan tulisan secara terpisah, mengatur distribusi non-ekskulif dari naskah yang telah terbit di jurnal ini kedalam versi yang lain, seperti: dikirim ke respository institusi penulis, publikasi kedalam buku, dan lain-lain. Dengan mengakui bahwa naskah telah terbit pertama kali pada MAMEN (Jurnal Manajemen).
