TEHUNUNA SEBAGAI REPRESENTASI NILAI RELIGIUS DAN SOLIDARITAS SOSIAL MASYARAKAT NEGERI LUHU, SERAM BARAT

Authors

  • Muhammad Junaldi Jufri Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Umar Juhfa Samal Universitas Pattimura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55123/sabana.v5i1.7811

Keywords:

Tradition, Tehununa, Religious Values, Social Solidarity, Luhu

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the religious values and social solidarity embedded in the Tehununa tradition practiced by the community of Negeri Luhu, West Seram Regency, Maluku. Tehununa is a cultural tradition performed on the 27th night of Ramadan and plays an important role in the social and religious life of the local community. This research employs a qualitative approach using an ethnographic method to understand the meanings and practices of the tradition within the community’s cultural context. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation. The research informants were selected using purposive sampling, focusing on individuals who possess knowledge and direct involvement in the implementation of the Tehununa tradition. The collected data were analyzed using the interactive data analysis model developed by Matthew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that the Tehununa tradition embodies several religious values, including gratitude to God, spiritual values related to the momentum of Ramadan, values of sharing and charity, and values of togetherness within the community. Furthermore, the tradition also reflects social solidarity that tends toward mechanical solidarity as proposed by Émile Durkheim, characterized by shared beliefs, collective participation, and strong communal ties among members of the community.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] I. Melikov, S. Kryuchkova, S. Khrapov, G. Otyutskiy, and E. Kryuchkova, “Correspondence between society and culture as form and content,” Journal Of Advanced Pharmacy Education And Research, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 162–166, 2021, doi: 10.51847/Brx3libQp3.

[2] D. B. KRONENFELD, “AN AGENT-BASED APPROACH TO CULTURAL (AND LINGUISTIC) CHANGE,” Cybern. Syst., vol. 35, no. 2–3, pp. 211–228, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.1080/01969720490426876.

[3] A. Tóth, “New Perspectives for Living Traditions: Intangible Cultural Heritage in North-East Hungary,” Acta Ethnographica Hungarica, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 421–437, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1556/022.2021.00014.

[4] Kasmawati, T. Maknun, A. B. T. Bandung, and M. Hasjim, “Cultural Value of Local Wisdom: Ritual Speech of the Marriage Process: Eastern Indonesia,” Journal of Ecohumanism, vol. 4, no. 1, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.62754/joe.v4i1.6353.

[5] S. B. Cake and J. Pederson, “‘Kinship like I’ve never experienced before’: Modern mechanical solidarity on the Appalachian trail network,” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, vol. 10, p. 101109, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101109.

[6] A. Gofman, “Durkheim’s Theory of Social Solidarity and Social Rules,” in The Palgrave Handbook of Altruism, Morality, and Social Solidarity, New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2014, pp. 45–69. doi: 10.1057/9781137391865_3.

[7] N. H. Kasman, A. M. Kone, and E. Bazergan, “THE ANALYSIS OF TEHUNUNA TRADITION IN LUHU, WEST SERAM REGENCY,” 2023.

[8] A. Darmansyah and A. Susanti, “Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Serawai dalam Tradisi Nujuh Likur: Relevansi Nilai-nilai Moral untuk Meningkatkan Literasi BudayaSiswa Sekolah Dasar ,” Edubase : Journal of Basic Education, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 127–141, Aug. 2022.

[9] J. D. Morgan, “The religious point of view: Death in some major religious traditions,” in Confronting Dying and Death, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2012, pp. 175–189. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84897164805&partnerID=40&md5=c7602efebb9caae80a45e5f795741ade

[10] S. V. Ryzhova, “Religiosity in the Context of the Culture of Trust,” Sociological Journal, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 44–63, 2017, doi: 10.19181/socjour.2017.23.3.5363.

[11] A. Ballestero and M. F. Lemus, “Ethnography,” in The Handbook of Teaching Qualitative and Mixed Research Methods, London: Routledge, 2023, pp. 88–92. doi: 10.4324/9781003213277-23.

[12] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D, Kedua. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.

[13] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015.

[14] A. Sillehu, “Tradisi Tehununa pada Masyarakat Negeri Luhu Pandangan Islam,” Al-Taddabur: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Peradaban dan Agama, vol. 7, no. 1, 2021.

[15] M. Adon and M. Renda, “UMMA KALADA SEBAGAI RUANG SAKRAL DAN MEDIA PENDIDIKAN MORAL SUKU KALINDAKANA WEELEWO KATODALOBO SUMBA BARAT DAYA MENURUT PEMIKIRAN MIRCEA ELIADE,” Harmoni, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 278–299, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.32488/harmoni.v21i2.590.

[16] bpk.xx.maluku, “Tradisi Tehununa / Ujung Tobu di Negeri Luhu, Huamual ,” https://www.instagram.com/p/C6iWk2jLaF8/?img_index=1.

[17] F. Suneth, “Upacara Tehununa Negeri Luhu, Budaya Masyarakat Menggembirakan Kemenangan,” https://www.cakranews.id/upacara-tehununa-negeri-luhu-budaya-masyarakat-menggembirakan-kemenangan/.

[18] I. U. Minnikulov and B. A. Babanov, “An interdisciplinary approach to the study of the concept of value,” E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 413, p. 03019, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/202341303019.

[19] H. Askeland, “Values—Reviewing the Construct and Drawing Implications for Values Work in Organisation and Leadership,” in Understanding Values Work, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 15–34. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-37748-9_2.

[20] A. G. Kosichenko, E. E. Burova, Y. O. Buluktaev, and D. R. Shaidulina, “Religious Values in the Modern World,” Religiovedenie, no. 4, pp. 129–138, 2022, doi: 10.22250/20728662_2022_4_129.

[21] A. Talal, “Anthropological conceptions of religion: Reflections on Geertz,” Am. Anthropol., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 237–259, 1983.

[22] P. Kivisto, “Social Solidarity,” in The Wiley‐Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory, Wiley, 2017, pp. 1–2. doi: 10.1002/9781118430873.est0363.

[23] L. HERZOG, “Durkheim on Social Justice: The Argument from ‘Organic Solidarity,’” American Political Science Review, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 112–124, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1017/S000305541700048X.

[24] A. Kenneth and S. Daynes, “Diversity and Social Solidarity : Émile Durkheim,” in Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World, 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 : SAGE Publications, Inc, 2017, pp. 97–142. doi: 10.4135/9781506357331.n4.

[25] A. M. Arif, “PERSPEKTIF TEORI SOSIAL EMILE DURKHEIM DALAM SOSIOLOGI PENDIDIKAN,” Jurnal Studi Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-15

How to Cite

Muhammad Junaldi Jufri, & Umar Juhfa Samal. (2026). TEHUNUNA SEBAGAI REPRESENTASI NILAI RELIGIUS DAN SOLIDARITAS SOSIAL MASYARAKAT NEGERI LUHU, SERAM BARAT. SABANA: Jurnal Sosiologi, Antropologi, Dan Budaya Nusantara, 5(1), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.55123/sabana.v5i1.7811

Issue

Section

Articles