Analisis Core Recovery Menggunakan Metode TCR dan Faktor Pengaruhnya pada Sampel Pengeboran Emas di PT Pegasus Mineral Nusantara, Aceh Tengah

Authors

  • Zabal Nur Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Rudy Anarta Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Yoszi Mingsi Anaperta Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55123/insologi.v4i4.6024

Keywords:

Core Recovery, Total Core Recovery (TCR), Core Drilling

Abstract

Exploration is a crucial stage in mining activities, providing quantitative and qualitative information about the existence of mineral deposits. One direct exploration method used is core drilling, which involves retrieving subsurface rock samples (cores) for laboratory analysis. The results of these analyses serve as a fundamental database for resource estimation. One key parameter for evaluating the success of core drilling is the core recovery value, which is the ratio of the length of the core obtained to the total length drilled. This value reflects how well the core represents actual subsurface geological conditions. PT Pegasus Mineral Nusantara is currently conducting core drilling activities as part of a gold exploration project located in Paya Tampu Village, Rusip Antara District, Central Aceh Regency, Aceh Province. However, several issues have been encountered during core drilling, such as core loss due to falling back into the borehole and discrepancies in measured core lengths (gain/loss). This study aims to calculate and analyze core recovery using the Total Core recovery (TCR) method from drilling samples and identify the factors affecting core recovery success. The findings of this research are expected to contribute to improving the quality and reliability of mineral exploration drilling programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abzalov, M. (2011). Sampling errors and control of assay data quality in exploration and mining geology. InTech.

Annels, A. E., & Dominy, S. C. (2003). Core recovery and quality: Important factors in mineral resource estimation. Applied Earth Science, 112(3), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1179/037174503225003881

Bemmelen, R. W. van. (1949). The geology of Indonesia (Vol. IA). The Hague: Government Printing Office.

Febriansa, D. (2014). Pencegahan masalah swelling dalam operasi pemboran pada formasi clay reaktif dengan kandungan smectite 78% di Laboratorium Lumpur Pemboran PPPTMGB Lemigas [Laporan penelitian].

Laporan Eksplorasi PT Pegasus Mineral Nusantara. (2024, Maret). Laporan internal perusahaan.

Laporan Pengeboran PT Pegasus Mineral Nusantara. (2024, April). Laporan internal perusahaan

Peta Geologi Lembar Takengon, Sumatra 1:250,000. (n.d.). Geological Map of the Takengon Quadrangle, Sumatra.

Siahaan, N. B. (2021). Pemetaan bahaya kegempaan wilayah Aceh dengan menggunakan metode Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis [Skripsi, Institut Teknologi Sumatera]. https://repository.itera.ac.id

Suryakanta. (2016). Core recovery and RQD (Rock Quality Designation). CivilBlog. https://civilblog.org

Valentine, S., & Norbury, D. (2011). Measurement of total core recovery; dealing with core loss and gain. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 44(3), 397–403. https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/10-067

Downloads

Published

2025-08-10

How to Cite

Zabal Nur, Anarta, R., & Anaperta, Y. M. (2025). Analisis Core Recovery Menggunakan Metode TCR dan Faktor Pengaruhnya pada Sampel Pengeboran Emas di PT Pegasus Mineral Nusantara, Aceh Tengah. INSOLOGI: Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, 4(4), 798–812. https://doi.org/10.55123/insologi.v4i4.6024