Mystical, Ontological, and Functionalist According to Cornelis Anthonie Van Peursen in The Theory of Philosophy of Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v1i4.1088Keywords:
Mystical, Ontological, Functionalist, Van PeursenAbstract
The world of philosophy has many approaches to obtaining the truth from a symptom that arises around humans. These approaches include both scientific and non-scientific approaches. Of these approaches, there are positivistic approaches and non-positivistic approaches. There is a lot of debate between these two schools, one of the characters is Cornelis Anthonie van Peursen who often criticizes the positivistic with his mindset so that he is called a non-positivistic figure and alludes also to the problem of cultural strategy that he initiated. The purpose of writing this scientific article is to understand in more detail the philosophy and how Cornelis Anthonie van Peursen's critique of positivism and its cultural strategy concerning the mystical, ontological, and functionalist in search for truth. This research was conducted through a review of literature studies. The author examines various relevant sources obtained from books, journal articles, and supporting readings to enrich the content of this scientific article. Researchers used Miles and Huberman's model data collection techniques, including data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions and verification. The results of the study stated that Van Peursen divided culture into three dimensions, namely mythic, ontological, and functionalist. The mystical stage is characterized by when a man believes that in his life he is surrounded by the forces that surround them. The ontological stage is characterized when a man has begun to use logic as a foothold for thinking, man has been freed from mythic power and dares to test things concretely. The functionalist stage is characterized by the attitude and state of mind that nature has not only been made an object but has become a tool to meet human needs to make life comfortable. This stage is characterized by the industrial revolution in the world and man treats nature by over-exploring it.
Downloads
References
Ahmadi, A., Hikmah, A. N., & Yudiawan, A. (2021). Ilmu dan Agama dalam Perspektif Filsafat Ilmu. Al-Fikr: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.32489/alfikr.v7i1.108
Atmaja, I. M. D. (2020). Filsafat Ilmu Sebagai Pembentuk Karakteristik Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Santiaji Pendidikan (JSP), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.36733/jsp.v10i1.693
B.a.i, P. D. G. (2020). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Autentik Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kajian: Ontologi, Epistemologi, Dan Aksiologi. Basastra, 9(1), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.24114/bss.v9i1.17773
Danial. (2014). Filsafat Ilmu. Yogyakarta: Kaukaba Dipantara.
Helmi, M. (2020). Pandangan Filosofis dan Teologis Tentang Hakikat Ilmu Pengetahuan Sebagai Landasan Pendidikan Islam. Tarbiyah Islamiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Agama Islam, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.18592/jtipai.v10i2.4311
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2009). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Jakarta: UI Press.
Nova, K. A. (2022). Filsafat Positivistik, Manusia Modern dan Kegagalan Modernitas. Genta Hredaya: Media Informasi Ilmiah Jurusan Brahma Widya STAHN Mpu Kuturan Singaraja, 6(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.55115/gentahredaya.v6i1.2108
Pradhani, S. I., & Sari, A. C. F. (2022). Penerapan Pendekatan Positivistik Dalam Penelitian Hukum Adat. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(3), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.3.2022.235-249
Pratama, F. (2018). The History of Thought: Philosophy in The View of Muslim Philosophers of The Middle Ages. ISTORIA Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sejarah, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/istoria.v14i2.22254
Simarmata, R. (2018). Pendekatan Positivistik dalam Studi Hukum Adat. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 30(3), 463–487. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.37512
Tanjung, A. K. J., Purwadi, H., & Hartiwiningsih. (2019). Paradigma Hakim Dalam Memutuskan Perkara Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 7(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i1.29178
Van Peursen, C. A. (1983). Orientasi di Alam Filsafat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Van Peursen, C. A. (1993). Susunan Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Van Peursen, C. A. (2014). Filsafat Ilmu. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Wisri, W., & Mughni, A. (2016). Paradigma Dasar Fenomenologis, Hermeneutika dan Teori Kritis. LISAN AL-HAL: Jurnal Pengembangan Pemikiran Dan Kebudayaan, 10(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.35316/lisanalhal.v10i1.109
Yassa, S., Hasby, M., & Wahyono, E. (2021). Strategi Pembelajaran Budaya dan Sistem Kepercayaan Masyarakat Bugis, Dari Mitos Ke Logos, Dan Fungsional (suatu Tinjauan Filsafat Budaya C.A. van Peursen). Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 7(2), 797–813. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v7i2.1818
Agung, A.A.Gede. 2012. “Metodelogi Penelitian Pendidikan”. Singaraja: Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
As’ad, Moh. 1998. Psikologi Industri. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Ahmad Qomarudin, Maslahah Maslahah, Arina Zulva Maulida
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
