Students' Comprehension of Types of English Presuppositions in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v1i4.1185Kata Kunci:
Comprehension, Presupposition, UtteranceAbstrak
A pragmatic viewpoint holds that a sentence's presuppositions govern the types of settings in which it may be felicitously stated (Karttunen, 1974). The purposes of the research were to identify the students’ utterance errors in the understanding of the uses of the types of presupposition and to assess the quantitative numbers of the students’ utterance errors in using presupposition. The data in this research were collected by giving presupposition tests to the students. This research was analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. There were 25 students were taken as a sample of research. The findings showed that the studen’s ability in uttering presupposition was 51%. (inadequate). The student's ability in classifying the types of presupposition was 67% (Fair). In conclusion, the students found it difficult to comprehend the speaker's meaning of presupposition.
Unduhan
Referensi
Bacovcin, H. A., Zehr, J., & Schwarz, F. (2018). To accommodate or to ignore?: The presuppositions of again and continue across contexts. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1).
Febrikal. (2015). An Analysis of Types of Presupposition in Time Magazine Advertisement. The Episteme Journal of Linguistics and Literature.
Karnedi, Zaim, M., & Mukhaiyar. (2021). Seven C’s Communication Skills Problems in Writing Business Letter of English Major Undergraduate Students. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT-8 2020), 579, 108–112. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210914.020
Karttunen, L. (1974b). Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics, 1(1–3), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1515/THLI.1974.1.1-3.181/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS
Mercer, R. (1991). Presuppositions and default reasoning: A study in lexical pragmatics. Workshop of SIGLEX (Special Interest Group within ACL on the Lexicon), 321–339.
Mercer, R. E. (1992). Default logic: Towards a common logical semantics for presuppositions and entailments. Journal of Semantics, 9(3), 223–250.
Natkare, B. (2015). Understanding Presupposition and Entailment. International Journal of Multifaceted and Multilingual Studies, 1–9.
Soames, S. (1989). Presupposition. In Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1171-0_9
Stateva, P., Andreetta, S., Reboul, A., & Stepanov, A. (2021). Bilingual Children’s Use of the ‘Maximize Presupposition’Principle. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 6.
Tambunan, A. R. S., Lubis, F. K., Purba, N., Girsang, M., & Sembiring, E. M. B. (2019). Presupposition in “Barbie and the Magic of Pegasus” Movie. Asian Themes in Social Sciences Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.33094/journal.139.2019.31.18.21
Weber, R. E. (1977). Presupposition and entailment in a theory of aspect in Russian. Scando-Slavica, 23(1), 161–171.
Yule, G. (2010). The study of language 4 th edition. Cambridge: Cambri Carlisle, JF (2010). Effects of Instruction in Morphological Awareness on Literacy Achievement: An Integrative Review. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(4), 464–487.
King, J. P. J., Loy, J. E., Rohde, H., & Corley, M. (2019). Interpreting nonverbal cues to deception in real time. PLoS ONE 15(3), pp. 1-25. DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/KXJ2B.
Mandal, F. B. 2014). Nonverbal communication in humans. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24(4): 417-421. DOI: 10.1080/10911359.2013.831288
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Karnedi Karnedi, Silvia Utami
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
