Pengaruh Peraturan Sekolah Adaptif terhadap Sikap Displin Peserta Didik dalam Human Centered Society 5.0 SMK Darul Falah Bulok Tanggamus

Penulis

  • Muhisom Muhisom Universitas Lampung
  • Febra Anjar Kusuma Universitas Lampung
  • Dian Permata Sari Universitas Lampung
  • Rima Yuni Saputri Universitas Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v5i2.7522

Kata Kunci:

Adaptive School Regulations, Student Discipline, Human-Centered Society 5.0, Character Education

Abstrak

This study aims to analyze the impact of adaptive school regulations on the formation of students’ disciplinary attitudes within the context of a human-centered Society 5.0 at SMK Darul Falah Bulok, Tanggamus. This research is motivated by the school’s need to foster discipline that is not merely based on compliance, but rather develops from students’ self-awareness and internal regulation. The study employs a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation involving the principal, teachers, and students as the main informants. The findings indicate that adaptive school regulations are characterized by flexibility, contextual relevance, participatory implementation, and the wise integration of technology. The implementation of these regulations has a positive impact on various aspects of student discipline, including improved punctuality, responsible use of technology, orderly classroom behavior, enhanced learning motivation, and consistent guidance through collaboration among schools, teachers, students, and parents. Optimization strategies include strengthening digital literacy, applying personalized approaches and individual counseling, conducting periodic monitoring, and encouraging active parental involvement. The main conclusion of this study is that adaptive school regulations are effective in shaping students’ disciplinary attitudes that are relevant to the demands of the Society 5.0 era and contribute to the development of humane, flexible, and student-centered educational policies.

This study aims to analyze the impact of adaptive school regulations on the formation of students’ disciplinary attitudes within the context of a human-centered Society 5.0 at SMK Darul Falah Bulok, Tanggamus. This research is motivated by the school’s need to foster discipline that is not merely based on compliance, but rather develops from students’ self-awareness and internal regulation. The study employs a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation involving the principal, teachers, and students as the main informants. The findings indicate that adaptive school regulations are characterized by flexibility, contextual relevance, participatory implementation, and the wise integration of technology. The implementation of these regulations has a positive impact on various aspects of student discipline, including improved punctuality, responsible use of technology, orderly classroom behavior, enhanced learning motivation, and consistent guidance through collaboration among schools, teachers, students, and parents. Optimization strategies include strengthening digital literacy, applying personalized approaches and individual counseling, conducting periodic monitoring, and encouraging active parental involvement. The main conclusion of this study is that adaptive school regulations are effective in shaping students’ disciplinary attitudes that are relevant to the demands of the Society 5.0 era and contribute to the development of humane, flexible, and student-centered educational policies.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

Deguchi, A., Hirai, C., Matsuoka, H., Nakano, T., Oshima, K., Tai, M., & Tani, S. (2020). Society 5.0: A people-centric super-smart society. Springer.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140.Fullan, M. (2021). The right drivers for whole system success. Centre for Strategic Education Seminar Series Paper, 274, 1–15.

Harayama, Y. (2019). Society 5.0: Human-centered society that balances economic advancement with the resolution of social problems by a system that highly integrates cyberspace and physical space. Information Processing and Management, 59(1), 45–56.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Ito, K., & Nakano, R. (2021). Reconceptualizing discipline for the digital era: Fostering self-regulation in Society 5.0. International Journal of Educational Technology, 8(3), 175–189.

Kim, H., & Park, J. (2022). Digital literacy and student discipline in smart learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 12345–12360.

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2022). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.

OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030: Conceptual learning framework. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2023). Shaping the future of education 2030: Trends and implications for policy makers. OECD Publishing.

Pratama, R., & Nugroho, A. (2022). Peran sekolah dalam membentuk self-regulated learning siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 11(3), 321–330.

Rahmawati, D., & Suyanto. (2023). Implementasi disiplin berbasis karakter di sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 13(2), 145–156.

Santoso, B., & Wibowo, A. (2024). Adaptive school policy in the era of Society 5.0. International Journal of Educational Studies, 15(1), 55–70.

Schleicher, A. (2022). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. OECD Publishing.

Shiroishi, Y., Uchiyama, K., & Suzuki, N. (2018). Society 5.0: For human security and well-being. Computer, 51(7), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.3011041

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Ubben, M. S., Kremer, F. E., Heinicke, S., Marohn, A., & Heusler, S. (2023). Smartphone Usage in Science Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Education Sciences, 13(4), 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040345

Yeager, D. S., Carroll, J. M., Buontempo, J., Cimpian, A., Woody, S., Crosnoe, R., & Dweck, C. S. (2022). Teacher mindsets help explain where a growth mindset intervention does and doesn’t work. Psychological Science, 33(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211028984

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2022). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-y

Zhao, Y. (2021). Build back better: Avoid the learning loss trap. Prospects, 51(1–3), 1–5.

Diterbitkan

2026-06-15

Cara Mengutip

Muhisom, M., Febra Anjar Kusuma, Dian Permata Sari, & Rima Yuni Saputri. (2026). Pengaruh Peraturan Sekolah Adaptif terhadap Sikap Displin Peserta Didik dalam Human Centered Society 5.0 SMK Darul Falah Bulok Tanggamus. SOSMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 5(2), 677–685. https://doi.org/10.55123/sosmaniora.v5i2.7522

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles