 |
POST-PUBLICATION DISCUSSION
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora welcomes evidence based scholarly discussion of the articles it has published. Comments are sent to the editorial office.
Welcome Contributions
| No. | Kind of contribution |
|---|---|
| 1 | Questions about the methods of a study. |
| 2 | Alternative interpretations of the findings. |
| 3 | Results of a replication. |
| 4 | Comments on the practical or policy use of the findings. |
| 5 | Other substantive observations. |
Which Route Fits Your Purpose?
| What you want to do | Where to go |
|---|---|
| Comment on a method, an analysis, or an interpretation, or report a replication | This page |
| Point out an error that needs a correction | Correction and Retraction |
| Report suspected plagiarism, fabrication, or other misconduct | Allegations of Misconduct |
| Submit new research in response to an article | Author Guidelines and Peer Review Process |
1. Submitting a Scholarly Comment
Please send the comment by email to jurnal.sosmaniora@gmail.com. Use the subject line Scholarly Comment: [Article Title and DOI]. Comments may be written in Indonesian or English. Each comment must be signed with the full name, the affiliation, and the email address of the person who submits it.
A comment must contain the following:
| No. | Required content |
|---|---|
| 1 | The title and the DOI of the article. |
| 2 | The specific issue that is raised. |
| 3 | The reasoning or the evidence behind the comment. |
| 4 | The relevant references. |
| 5 | Any competing interests, as described in the Conflicts of Interest policy. |
Please follow these guidelines when you write a comment:
| No. | Guidance |
|---|---|
| 1 | Keep the comment concise. |
| 2 | Criticize the work, not the authors. |
| 3 | Separate errors that have been proven, questions that are still open, and differences of interpretation. |
| 4 | Leave out confidential information and details that identify participants, unless they are essential. |
2. Editorial Consideration and Author Response
| Topic | What happens |
|---|---|
| Assessment | Editors assess the relevance, the clarity, the evidence, and the contribution of each comment. Independent specialists may be consulted. |
| Response of the authors | The authors of the article may be invited to respond. Their right to respond does not allow them to decide whether a criticism is considered. |
| Publication is not guaranteed | Disagreement alone does not guarantee that a comment will be published. |
| Concerns on other platforms | A concern that is raised on an external platform may be examined once it is brought to the attention of the journal. |
| Integrity concerns | A credible concern about research integrity is assessed without requiring a published comment first. |
3. Publication and Assessment Status
| Topic | What happens |
|---|---|
| Labeling | An approved comment or reply is clearly labeled and linked to the article. |
| Assessment status | Correspondence that is assessed by the editors is not presented as having passed standard peer review. |
| New research | New research that is submitted in response to an article follows the Peer Review Process. |
| Timing | Publication is not automatic, and there is no fixed timeline. |
| Public criticism and reuse | This procedure does not limit lawful public criticism of an article, or the reuse of articles that are published under CC BY 4.0 outside the journal, as described on the Licensing page. |
Related Policies and Enquiries
Questions about this procedure may be sent to the editorial office at jurnal.sosmaniora@gmail.com.
| Topic | Page |
|---|---|
| Suspected misconduct | Allegations of Misconduct |
| Errors that require a change to the published record | Correction and Retraction |
| General standards of conduct | Publication Ethics |
| Declaring competing interests | Conflicts of Interest |
| Reuse of published articles | Licensing |
| Submitting new research | Author Guidelines and Peer Review Process |
